<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (La)TeX, 10 years later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.konstantin.shemyak.com/blog/2009/05/11/latex-10-years-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.konstantin.shemyak.com/blog/2009/05/11/latex-10-years-later/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:01:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirill Evstigneev</title>
		<link>http://www.konstantin.shemyak.com/blog/2009/05/11/latex-10-years-later/comment-page-1/#comment-13144</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirill Evstigneev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.konstantin.shemyak.com/blog/?p=186#comment-13144</guid>
		<description>Let understand your post as &quot;TeX is not excellent&quot;. But it&#039;s still good. Otherwise what&#039;s better? Let see.

Compiler based tools (like TeX iеself). Most of them are more difficult to use (like DocBook with its complex SGML tags). And none of them has a notable part of TeX typesetting features. WYSIWYG tools again seldom have as much features as TeX has. And they &lt;em&gt;newer&lt;/em&gt; produce the same quality printed output as TeX do (because TeX is a compiler). And their usability is often an illusion.

Use simplicity. I newer seen a non-interactive typesetting system that is so easy to use. Years ago I and my sister wrote our diploma thesis&#039;s . Simultaneously, sharing a single computer. My sister used touch typing professionally and took 70% of our computer in MS Word. I (half-year TeX user) got remaining 30% in LaTeX. Obviously my paper was more complex, looked better and was ready first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let understand your post as &#8220;TeX is not excellent&#8221;. But it&#8217;s still good. Otherwise what&#8217;s better? Let see.</p>
<p>Compiler based tools (like TeX iеself). Most of them are more difficult to use (like DocBook with its complex SGML tags). And none of them has a notable part of TeX typesetting features. WYSIWYG tools again seldom have as much features as TeX has. And they <em>newer</em> produce the same quality printed output as TeX do (because TeX is a compiler). And their usability is often an illusion.</p>
<p>Use simplicity. I newer seen a non-interactive typesetting system that is so easy to use. Years ago I and my sister wrote our diploma thesis&#8217;s . Simultaneously, sharing a single computer. My sister used touch typing professionally and took 70% of our computer in MS Word. I (half-year TeX user) got remaining 30% in LaTeX. Obviously my paper was more complex, looked better and was ready first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

